Category: Blog

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Owens vs. City of Independence

Owens v. City of Independence. This landmark 1980 U.S. Supreme Court case sheds light on a pathway to accountability for government entities, helping families impacted by overreaching agencies find legal recourse.

The Supreme Court ruled in Owens’ favor, stating that municipalities are not shielded by “qualified immunity” when accused of constitutional violations. The Court reasoned that municipalities and government entities could not escape accountability when their actions directly violate citizens’ constitutional rights. This ruling is essential for individuals facing government overreach, as it established that local governments could be held liable for rights violations carried out by their officials.

How Owens Applies to Child Welfare Agencies

For families impacted by child welfare agencies that unjustly remove children from their homes, Owens v. City of Independence is relevant in several ways:

  1. Establishing Municipal Liability: Just as the City of Independence was held liable for violating Owens’ rights, child welfare agencies may similarly be held accountable for infringing on the constitutional rights of parents and children. By showing that the agency acted under color of law to unjustly deprive families of their rights, families may argue that the agency itself bears responsibility for these wrongful actions.
  2. Constitutional Rights to Family Integrity: Owens reinforced that municipalities could be sued for damages when constitutional rights are violated. Parents have a recognized constitutional right to raise their children without unjust interference by the state. When child welfare agencies remove children without sufficient evidence or due process, they are infringing on this fundamental right. The reasoning in Owens supports the notion that agencies and local governments must answer for such breaches of due process.
  3. Accountability Despite Qualified Immunity: While individual social workers and officials often claim qualified immunity, Owens held that municipalities themselves do not have this protection when sued under certain claims, such as those alleging constitutional violations. Therefore, parents may argue that even if individual caseworkers are immune, the agency itself is liable for systemic violations or policies that led to the wrongful removal of their children.
  4. Seeking Damages for Rights Violations: The Owens ruling allows individuals to pursue damages for the harm caused by constitutional violations. For affected families, this means that child welfare agencies could potentially be liable for the pain, suffering, and trauma caused by their overreach. When child welfare agencies act in bad faith, remove children without clear evidence, or deny families fair hearings, Owens supports the argument that these agencies can be held financially accountable.

Pathways to Justice for Families

Families affected by unjust actions of child welfare agencies often feel powerless, and the legal system can seem like an insurmountable barrier. However, cases like Owens v. City of Independence offer a framework for holding agencies accountable. Here are steps that families and advocates can consider when seeking justice:

  1. Documenting Due Process Violations: If a family was denied a fair hearing, or if child welfare decisions were made without clear evidence, these due process violations are essential to document. As in Owens, showing that rights were violated through lack of due process strengthens a claim against the agency.
  2. Filing Civil Rights Claims: With a clear basis in Owens, families may consider filing claims under Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act, which allows individuals to sue for constitutional rights violations committed under color of law. This can apply to cases where child welfare agencies removed children without just cause, using false or misleading evidence, or blocking parents from presenting their side.
  3. Pursuing Municipal Liability: Rather than focusing solely on individual caseworkers who may be shielded by qualified immunity, families may bring suit against the agency as an entity, claiming that it bears responsibility for its practices, policies, or customs that led to the rights violations. This aligns with the Owens ruling, which opens the door for holding local government agencies accountable.
  4. Seeking Injunctive Relief: In cases where agencies continue to engage in unjust practices, families might also seek injunctive relief to prevent further rights violations. This could include court orders mandating changes to agency practices or requiring the agency to provide due process protections.
Posted on by — Leave a comment

Top 5 Reasons Why Save Our Children is Vital for Child Welfare

Child welfare is at the heart of our mission at Save Our Children. There is a deep-seated need in every youngster for the safety and comfort of a home. We at Save Our Children are dedicated to fostering this fundamental need by promoting the idea that kids should grow up in the warm, caring arms of their biological families. We have committed ourselves to maintaining the idea that children’s greatest interests are met inside their biological family settings because we understand the intrinsic significance of these familial ties.

 

  1. The Importance of Biological Bonds

Human nature is inherently rooted in the bond between a kid and its biological parents. The emotional and psychological growth of a kid depends critically on this special link. Studies have repeatedly demonstrated that children who grow up with their biological parents typically experience better health outcomes, higher levels of academic success, and a decreased likelihood of behavioral issues. At Save Our Children, we are committed to maintaining these essential relationships because we think that a child is best placed with their own family wherever feasible.

 

  1. Stability and Continuity

In a child’s existence, familiarity and regularity are essential. An alternative care arrangement frequently lacks the sense of security and continuity that comes with being raised inside one’s original family. Being a part of the cultural, historical, and emotional narrative of their family gives children a sense of identification and belonging that is beneficial. Our lobbying activities recognize the long-term advantages of stability in the family and work to prevent children from being taken away from it.

 

  1. Preventing Trauma from Separation

Except for situations in which the child’s safety is in jeopardy, being separated from biological parents can cause severe distress. The psychological turmoil resulting from this separation may have a long-term impact on a child’s welfare. At Save Our Children, we fight to stop this kind of trauma by supporting laws and procedures that put family unity first and deal with the underlying issues that lead to family breakups, such as lack of resources, addiction, or poverty.

 

  1. Empowering Families

We think that families should be given the tools they need to overcome obstacles that might endanger their capacity to remain together. We are enhancing communities overall by endorsing programs that give people access to social services, healthcare, and education in addition to assisting individual families. Our strategy is one of empathy and support, working with families to develop the ability to give their kids secure, supportive surroundings.

 

  1. Advocating for Reform

Last but not least, we support policy improvements because of our steadfast dedication to the well-being of children. To create a child welfare system that represents the best interests of the child, we oppose policies and regulations that force children to be separated from their families. Our goal is to change the system such that it strengthens the sacred tie between a kid and their biological family, rather than weakening it.

 

Conclusion

In summary, Save Our Children is committed to the belief that the existence of solid, biological family ties is a prerequisite for a child’s wellbeing. Our research highlights how vital these relationships are to emotional, psychological, and general well-being. We support consistency and stability in a child’s life because we recognize that the pain resulting from separation can have detrimental effects for a lifetime. Our programs are aimed not just at stopping these splits but also at giving families the tools they need to overcome the obstacles that threaten them.

Our dedication to promoting child welfare changes doesn’t waver as we proceed. We envision a society in which all children, with the help of laws and institutions that uphold and acknowledge these essential bonds, are given the chance to develop and flourish within their biological families. Come together with us as we work to give our kids a better, safer future where child welfare and family unity are not just ideals but are realities.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted on by — Leave a comment

First Steps to Self-Representation

We the people United States Code

The first step in representing yourself in court is to read the Pro Se Guide that courts provide to self-represented litigants as a courtesy. This is step that most people skip but it is essential to your success because it tells the judge that you respect the court. When the judge knows you respect the court, then the judge will respect you and want to read what you have to say in your documents.

Of course there will always be some biased judge who are bad apples and do not respect anyone no matter what, it is important that you read the rules so you can know if even the court officers are acting beyond the bounds of courtroom etiquette.

Click Here to access the Pro Se Guide.  Pro Se Guide

The beginning of the Pro Se Guide includes some important vocabulary that you should be familiar with when representing yourself in court. Knowing these words will ensure court officials dont use words that you dont understand. Be sure not to ask what the word means because it will only demonstrate your failure to read the Pro Se Guide. Learning the vocabular in the Pro Se Guider will also ensure you express yourself coherently in court and don’t use terminology that the court isnt’f familiar with. Reading goes a long way in improving the communication between you and the court.

After you have read the Pro Se Guide, your first documented communication with the court should be to notice them that you will be representing yourself and you will not be using attorney services. You can draft your own notice letter or you can use a Notice_Self_Representation that courts many times provide to Pro Se litigants as a courtesy.

 

Posted on by — Leave a comment

The Language of the Juvenile Courts

For many parents seeking to reunify with their children, courtrooms can seem like an intimidating place. In fact, court room decorum is a lot like preparing to dine with the Queen of England because there are rules and language used that are never used in real world settings. Nevertheless, its important to know what they are ahead of time so that one may feel confident in speaking and “pleading” in court.

The old saying that ‘reading is fundamental’ holds true. The more a parent, grandparent, or teen reads about the subject-matter of juvenile justice, criminal law, ad civil law, the more aptitude they will have in their understanding of the court processes. Reading will help the seeker learn the vocabulary, terminology, and language used by industry professionals. Moreover, the readers writing and overall communication with the court will improve as a result.

“What material should I read?”

It’s great to start with reading material from the Children’s Bureau available at the United States Administration for Children and Families website.  Once at the site, one can read more about the supervising agency the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Spend time at the site because it can take days or even months to go through all of the policy material.

Another good place to read about class-action lawsuits on the behalf of children and families is ChildrensRights.org. The organization has a lot of experience with holding the agencies accountable for living up the the missions they profess to uphold. The great thing about this website is you get to see actual lawsuits!

After getting warmed up with the agencies and administrative readings, it is time to get down to brass tacks and read the law. Start with an outline of the key concepts that need to be addressed. After reading the outline, begin reading the Restatements of the Law on Children and the Law.  This is one of the single best resources for understanding all the issues surrounding justice for your family.

stackofbooks
Reading is Fundamental

By reading these documents you will be MORE prepared the the attorneys in court and maybe even the judge. In the even that someone tries to use a big word in order to give you a ‘raw deal’, you can call them on it and ‘ Object’ because you know what is happening and understand the proceeding.

“What if I don’t understand what I am reading?”

In the beginning stages of reading, don’t start off reading for comprehension. Start of reading just for familiarity. Keep in mind the practice makes perfect and that you may need to read one document 20 times in order to truly absorb and comprehend the material at a mastery level.

Trust the process. Begin with the end in mind and more importantly understand that this is a journey- a wilderness experience that God intended you to go through in order to build your character and test your faithfulness.

“Weeping may endure for a night but joy cometh in the morning”.  Psalm 30:5